vRRitti.com, providing sentiency

• The judges did, however, consider it proven that Sunde played an active part in the development, the financing and the day-to-day administration of TPB. He functioned as an office manager and was closely involved in creating a good system for managing traffic to the site. Furthermore, he was responsible for advertisement, for which he cooperated with advertising companies in Sweden and Israel.
• Fredrik Neij confirmed to the court that he was active on a daily basis to keep TPB operational. Furthermore, it followed from his statements that he was aware that he contributed to copyright infringement. To prevent this, he could have done two things. He could have taken steps to remove links to the infringing content. Or, more drastically, he could have just pulled the plug from the servers.
• Carl Lundström was perceived as the main supplier of the hardware used by the admins of TPB. He was charged with having invested in computers from his own means and having made them available to TPB. He himself indicated to see TPB as customer, and to see the free delivery as a mere loan to be repaid at a later date. However, from Lundström’s own administration and his testimonies it became clear that in 2005, the period treated in the case, Lundström was very closely and personally involved with setting up TPB and that TPB was not paying for the computers.

More: http://futureofcopyright.com/index.php?page=news&id=1439