Archive for 2011/02/03

Service providers who offer a service to customers with which they can send, receive, or spread information via an electronic network, can also be defined as an ‘electronic communications provider’. According to the Belgium Supreme Court, these service providers can be compelled to provide certain data upon request of a public prosecutor on the basis of article 46bis of the Belgium Criminal Procedure Code. The Court of Gent – who previously ruled differently in this case – therefore must rule again in this case.

Basically, the Belgium Supreme Court ruled indirectly that Yahoo can be considered an ‘electronic communication service provider’ and could be compelled by a Belgium public prosecutor to provide data on its customers. The final outcome of the case is not certain yet, but it seems to me that it might be very difficult for the Court of Gent to rule otherwise.

Much more: http://oerlemansblog.weblog.leidenuniv.nl/2011/02/03/belgium-vs-yahoo

Much more: http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/02/governments-celebrate-international-privacy-day

http://jeremiahgrossman.blogspot.com/2011/02/do-not-track-how-about-piggybacking-on.html

http://gizmodo.com/5750210/five-ways-the-android+powered-google-tablet-is-better-than-the-ipad

http://vimeo.com/19447662

http://gizmodo.com/5750429/everything-is-a-remix

 Start running drills and setting up groups of government and private workers who are ready to spring into action in the event of a serious attack. If they have to temporarily shut down part of an Internet pipe to stop an attack, so be it. But, shutting down a large swath of the US Internet in order to block all potential attack vectors would spread fear and panic, cut off people who can potentially help, and, arguably, violate the First Amendment rights of Americans.

http://www.zdnet.com/blog/btl/takeaways-from-egypt-kill-the-kill-switch-and-decentralize-the-internet/44417

See also:

I’ve changed my mind. America must never allow an Internet “kill switch”. Here’s why.
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/government/ive-changed-my-mind-america-must-never-allow-an-internet-kill-switch-heres-why/9982

http://www.ispreview.co.uk/story/2011/02/03/cisco-records-explosion-in-mobile-broadband-data-traffic-during-2010.html

 ”As an ISP, a library can be made responsible for the monitoring of their networks for copyright infringement and incur significant financial obligations as a result. As a subscriber, libraries are likely to receive notifications from their ISP to the effect that a copyright owner has made a report against them for alleged copyright infringement. The financial and time costs of complying with or appealing against this type of situation cannot be underestimated, nor can the types of penalty that could be imposed on libraries as result of an infringement by an individual user, such as the imposition of technical measures (such as reductions in quality of internet service, which ultimately affect library users).

The imposition of new restrictions on library networks runs counter to the library’s vital mission of providing freedom of access to information to its users. Not only does the legislation potentially lead to or encourage the adoption of blocking technologies that are valuable for learning and information sharing in an educational context, it also raises fundamental freedom of expression and privacy issues as public bodies inevitably monitor the activities of their users.

The chilling effect of the monitoring of Internet use should not be underestimated, and the electronic recording of library users’ information seeking activities is not consistent with a democratic approach to access to knowledge. Library users should be free to seek information without barriers, and without fear of surveillance.”

More: http://www.ispreview.co.uk/story/2011/02/03/750000-world-libraries-raise-serious-objections-to-uk-digital-economy-act.html

And the thing is, Perfect 10 seems to lose in court pretty consistently

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110202/04054012923/perfect-10-aiming-to-lose-yet-again-sues-megaupload.shtml

See also:

Is Perfect 10 fighting for another lost cause?
We’re looking forward to review the quality of Perfect 10’s complaint and associated evidence this time. In any event, their actions have helped to define case law concerning copyright.
http://futureofcopyright.com/index.php?page=news&id=1615

http://tinyurl.com/47bkveh

During his time at the IWF, Robbins led the organisation in its sometimes controversial adoption and roll-out of the URL blocking service Cleanfeed. At the same time, he brought to the IWF an air of dignified calm, perhaps learnt from his days as Borough Commander in Hackney Police, which went well with the IWF’s international prominent role in issues of internet governance

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/02/03/iwf_chief_steps_down/

Mitchell was able to gain unauthorized access Zynga’s system by posing as one of the company’s site administrators. He then transferred 400 billion gaming chips into fake Facebook accounts he set up. The price of the stolen booty would have come to $12m if Zynga had issued it, prosecutors said

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/02/02/zynga_chip_theft/

The ring – self-dubbed S3 – bought the financial details and identities of ID theft victims, via online portals

http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2011/02/03/apple_scam/

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/02/03/assange_documents_leaked/

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/02/heritage-foundation-says-abolish-key-fcc-powers.ars

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/02/where-have-all-the-music-pirates-gone.ars

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/02/senator-us-domain-name-seizures-alarmingly-unprecedented.ars