Archive for 2011/07/18

Police investigate new computer hacking claims linked to News International

More: http://cryptome.org/0005/fru-murdoch.htm

Dutch language news article: http://www.zdnet.be/news/67967/franstalige-kranten-terug-op-google/

http://youranonnews.tumblr.com/post/7693504120/as-some-of-you-know-we-got-banned-from

German language news article: http://www.bild.de/news/inland/hacker-angriff/hacker-angriff-auf-zoll-schlamperei-18896742.bild.html

Twenty-One Individuals Charged to Date in the United States  for Alleged Roles in Internet Fraud Scheme

More: http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2011/July/11-crm-926.html

Telecoms operators and internet service providers normally hold a range of  data about their customers, such as name, address and bank account details, in  addition to information about phone calls and internet connections. In general,  providers are required by EU law to keep this data confidential and secure.  However, sometimes the data can be stolen or lost, or someone could gain  unauthorised access to the data.

These cases are known as ‘personal data  breaches’. Under the revised ePrivacy Directive (2002/58/EC), when a personal  data breach occurs, the provider has to report this to a specific national  authority, usually the data protection authority or the communications  regulator. Also, the provider has to inform the subscriber or individual  directly if there is a risk to personal data or privacy.

To make sure that data breaches are reported in a consistent manner across  the EU, the ePrivacy Directive allows the Commission to propose ‘technical  implementing measures’ – practical rules to complement the existing legislation – on the circumstances, formats and procedures for the notification  requirements.

More: http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/ecomm/library/public_consult/data_breach/index_en.htm

http://www.scmagazine.com.au/News/263634,paypal-cso-calls-for-antisec-hunt.aspx

http://www.crn.com.au/News/263576,toshiba-hacked-admin-reseller-logins-exposed.aspx

The “Glomar response,” to neither confirm nor deny, is a  controversial legal doctrine that allows agencies to conceal the existence of records that might otherwise be subject to public disclosure. EPIC plans to appeal this decision

http://epic.org/2011/07/epic-v-nsa-agency-can-neither.html

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/jul/18/david-cameron-hamstrung-compromised-position

http://torrentfreak.com/high-court-judge-threatened-over-pirate-bay-injunction-110718/

http://www.newscenter.philips.com/main/corpcomms/news/press/2011/20110718_q2.wpd

http://fusible.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Modernwarfare3-Com-Udrp-Complaint.pdf

http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/news/2011/07/internet-explorer-9-utterly-dominates-malware-blocking-stats.ars

http://torrentfreak.com/isp-refuses-to-block-the-pirate-bay-110717/