Archive for 2011/08/03

The investigation launched in 2009 has led to arrests in the US and 13 other  countries of participants in Dreamboard, which had a “VIP” ranking system for  members trading in graphic images and videos of adults molesting children age 12  and under, often violently, the Justice Department said today.

“Dreamboard’s creators and members lived all over the world – but they  allegedly were united by a disturbing belief that the sexual abuse of children  is proper conduct that should not be criminalised,” Attorney General Eric Holder  said.

“The members of this criminal network shared a demented dream to create the  preeminent online community for the promotion of child sexual exploitation, but  for the children they victimised, this was nothing short of a nightmare.”

Read more:

http://www.news.com.au/breaking-news/us-charges-72-over-nightmare-child-porn/story-e6frfku0-1226107892380

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/08/judge-orders-shutdown-of-dvd-streaming-service-zediva.ars

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/08/california-judge-trolling-with-someone-elses-facebook-is-identity-theft.ars

http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-20087374-93/google-speeds-to-25-million-users-in-first-month/

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/08/02/google_chrome_thirteen_released/

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/08/03/uk_police_warns_hacktivists/

In the medium to longer term we consider that deep packet inspection techniques are likely to provide a more robust approach to blocking than DNS. Although costly to implement today, we would expect that costs will fall as the larger ISPs invest in DPI devices for other purposes. However, for it to be part of a legislative approach the cost burden for smaller ISPs would need careful evaluation as would legal concerns related to compatibility with privacy, data protection and interception rules.

In related news, lobbying by ISPs has succeeded in freeing them from paying for the setup costs for a copyright tribunal, designed to give copyright-infringing broadband users an appeals process.

You can find the Hargreaves Report reaction here – and the next steps on implementing the Digital Economy Act, including Ofcom’s 57-page study on website-blocking – here.

Vince Cable formally announced that the Coalition government is blessing all the proposals advanced in Ian Hargreaves IP review, the “Google Review”.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/08/03/ip_policy_roundup/

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/08/02/android_malware_records_calls/

More: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/aug/03/government-scraps-filesharing-sites-block

“A lot of this has to do with consumer freeedom. We need to have a legal framework that supports consumer use rather than treat it as regrettable. We can’t say that businesses should embrace technology but say to consumers they can’t use technology for products they have paid for.”

More: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/aug/03/government-scraps-filesharing-sites-block

http://www.ispreview.co.uk/story/2011/08/03/davenport-lyons-lawyers-fined-and-suspended-for-illegal-isp-piracy-threat-letters.html

They also query the right of a quango to make itself legislator supreme – when its job is to carry out the law. Whatever you think of web-blocking, that’s a valid concern. Elected legislators make laws, the judiciary interprets them. Or is that a bit “analog era”? Two years ago Cameron called for “a new era of Google government“. This must be what it looks like…

More http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/08/02/cable_digital_economy_announcement_tomorrow/

http://tinyurl.com/3g5f842

What does this app do? – Blocks websites owned and operated by Newscorp Which websites are blocked? The default list is only news and publication sites but that can be customized on the options page. How is a site blocked? – When the user opens a blocked site, a warning is displayed and the user is given an option to continue to the site.

As at 11.00am Saturday (London time), the Chrome extension had already garnered 1,884 users and 2,248 weekly installs. The description of the extension said it is capable of blocking websites owned and operated by Newscorp.

http://www.zimeye.org/?p=32822

http://www.thehimalayantimes.com/fullNews.php?headline=Website’s+SMS+traffic+blocked+for+spoofing&NewsID=296846

The list of sites to be filtered is maintained by Interpol, which has a set criteria for what goes on to the list. Sites are alleged to be those depicting child sexual abuse, and Interpol claims that the domains listed are checked and verified by at least two different countries. The actual domains contained on the list are kept confidential, as they are illegal in most countries.

http://www.zdnet.com.au/optus-implements-internet-filter-339319577.htm

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110802/03153215354/uk-business-secretary-blocking-sites-under-dea-is-unworkable-time-to-add-more-exceptions-to-copyright.shtml

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/03/us-cyberattacks-idUSTRE7720HU20110803