vRRitti.com, providing sentiency

The conference called Freedom Online: Joint action for Free Expression on the Internet, will gather Ministers from Sweden, Canada, Estonia, Kenya and Tunisia as well as representatives of companies such as Google, Facebook, Twitter, Telecom and Internet Providers.

Human Rights Watch and Free Press Unlimited will participate too.

http://www.facebook.com/ifreedom2011

http://twitter.com/ifreedom_2011

Dutch language government press release:
http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/ministeries/bz/nieuws/2011/11/24/clinton-naar-den-haag-voor-conferentie-over-internetvrijheid.html

Previously:

Those who disrupt the free flow of information in our society or any other pose a threat to our economy, our government, and our civil society. Remarks on Internet Freedom – Hillary Rodham Clinton, January 21, 2010

http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2010/01/135519.htm

Events that could occur:

1. Spam algorithms blocking e-mails containing certain references;
2. Video distribution algorithms arguing that spam, copyright or other policies have been violated and removing content;
3. Video distribution algorithms turning off the option to have third parties embed videos on their sites;
4. Video distribution algorithms arguing that ‘the user’ has removed content or that his account has been terminated for some reason;
5. Trending and ranking algorithms forgetting to trend and rank certain content;
6. Content, websites and blogs accidentally being taken down “due to an automated process;”
7. Network  algorithms stating “The server encountered a temporary error and could not complete your request. Please try again in 30 seconds. That’s all we know;”
8. Algorithms deciding that posted content should only be showing up to the person who posted it;
9. Algorithms accidentally polluting search indices with an abundance of irrelevant search results;
10. Algorithms stating that there was a content delivery failure for whatever reason;
11. Algorithms redirecting internet users from the content the user intended to visit to content that is probably much more to the user’s liking.

Instead of simply removing critical content causing all kinds of public outrage and civil disorder, it’s probably much more effective to have people believe that either it has been taken down accidentally, that it’s still out there somewhere but couldn’t reach its destination due to a technical malfunction, or that people are just not that interested in the message.

More:
http://vrritti.com/2011/10/03/occupywallstreet-demonstrates-that-there-are-many-ways-to-intentionally-accidentally-or-unconsciously-but-automatically-disrupt-the-free-flow-of-information/ 

And in that no man’s land bureaucracy rules.

Policy and law are nothing but paperwork. And paperwork can be very patient. And pay attention…when the effectuation of a law or policy fails, new laws or policies are being introduced.

The current system supports the view of those who never want to carry any responsibility for the effectuation of any policy or law. “It was before my time, or after my time, but certainly not during my time.”

Dutch politics has forgotten how to rule.

Much more (Dutch language article):
http://www.security.nl/artikel/39311/1/Ik_Zal_Niet_Handhaven.html

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/11/25/foi_act_stifling_ministerial_debate/