Archive for 2012/03/05

US authorities’ treatment of WikiLeaks suspect Private Bradley Manning was “cruel and degrading,” the UN special rapporteur on torture Juan Ernesto Mendez said.

Mendez said that “fortunately” the alleged mistreatment ended when Manning was transferred from Quantico to another prison in Kansas.

“But the explanation I was given for those eight months was not convincing for me,” he said, speaking on the sidelines of a UN Human Rights Council meeting in Geneva.

Jailed for more than a year and a half before his arraignment last month, Manning, 24, has complained of being placed in solitary confinement, of bullying by guards, and of being subjected to an ultra restrictive regime in Quantico.

At his arraignment hearing at the Fort Meade army base on February 24, when he declined to enter a plea, Manning’s civilian lawyer, David Coombs, said his client had been in confinement for 635 days.

More:
http://outcomemag.com/news/2012/03/05/un-official-slams-wikileaks-suspect-mannings-treatment/

Such deviants are intent on trashing either an organization or its members by hacking into their primary records and sources of information. Simply put, they are common, basic thieves.

In our society it has been a generally respected practice in journalism that one’s sources of information are sacred. Journalists have gone to jail for refusing to identify their sources in some cases. Within the police and security systems of any nation, intelligence gathering has from its earliest beginnings guaranteed the protection of informants.

True statesmen have always honored a basic code of seeking to withhold information that is too sensitive to reveal publicly for risk of harming public morale or for reasons of national security. These we term “state secrets.” I remember conversing years ago with Australian Prime Minister Robert Menzies’s private secretary and asking him what he thought was his boss’s greatest strength as a national leader. He responded, “Sir Robert knew what to tell the people and what not to tell them.”

The general challenge to civilized society today is that the overthrow of certain absolutes that underpin the moral standards of the state has led to an assertion that “transparency” in the exchange of information should govern all—that the nation, its institutions both private and public should bare all before the public, notwithstanding the risks to state security.

But it’s not just this naive, utopianist, liberal philosophy that is at the basis of the actions of the likes of such 21st-century fifth columnists as Anonymous, WikiLeaks and VroniPlag. Theirs is a far more sinister motive. It is the destruction of either individuals, their character, or of whole enterprises whose very existence is at odds with their warped sense of the world.

Shady, cowardly organizations such as Anonymous, intent solely on destroying legitimate enterprises, or those motivated with the intent of destroying a person’s good name and character such as VroniPlag, or on stealing and publicizing sensitive government data such as WikiLeaks, are a blight on society.

They need to be condemned and dealt with as such.

More:
http://www.thetrumpet.com/9182.8020.0.0/society/media/stratfor-vs-anonymous-wikileaks

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange accused the American government of conducting “a neo-McCarthyist witch-hunt” against his organisation as it released confidential e-mails from Stratfor, a Texas-based private intelligence firm, claiming that American authorities had “a secret indictment” against him in place for “more than 12 months”.

Mr. Assange said: “For over a year now, the U.S. Attorney-General Eric Holder has been conducting a secret Grand Jury investigation into WikiLeaks. This neo-McCarthyist witch-hunt against WikiLeaks may be Mr. Holder’s defining legacy. Any student of American history knows that secret justice is no justice at all. Justice must be seen to be done. Legitimate authority arises out of the informed consent of the governed, not Eric Holder’s press secretary. Secret Grand Juries with secret indictments are apparently Eric Holder’s preferred method of dealing with publishers who hold his administration to account. Eric Holder has betrayed the legacy of Madison and Jefferson. He should drop the case or resign. Should he continue, however, the Obama administration may not — Democrats and Republicans alike believe in the right to tell the truth.”

More:
http://www.thehindu.com/news/international/article2947096.ece

Previously:

Three WikiLeaks backers lost their bid to keep information on them collected from their Twitter Inc. accounts from being turned over to U.S. prosecutors who are investigating the group’s publication of classified information. The subscribers challenging the order include Birgitta Jonsdottir, a member of the Icelandic parliament; Jacob Appelbaum, a computer security researcher who represented WikiLeaks at a 2010 hacker’s conference in New York; and Rop Gonggrijp, described in court papers as a Dutch activist and businessman.
More:
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-01-06/wikileaks-backers-lose-bid-to-keep-twitter-data-from-u-s-.html

Assange was sitting opposite Rop Gonggrijp, a Dutch activist, hacker, and businessman. Gonggrijp—thin and balding,with a soft voice—has known Assange well for several years. He had noticed Assange’s panicky communiqués about being watched and decided that his help was needed. “Julian can deal with incredibly little sleep, and a hell of a lot of chaos, but even he has his limits, and I could see that he was stretching himself,” Gonggrijp told me. “I decided to come out and make things sane again.” Gonggrijp became the unofficial manager and treasurer of Project B, advancing about ten thousand euros to WikiLeaks to finance it. He kept everyone on schedule, and made sure that the kitchen was stocked with food and that the Bunker was orderly.

At around three in the afternoon, an Icelandic parliamentarian named Birgitta Jonsdottir walked in. Jonsdottir, who is in her forties, with long brown hair and bangs, was wearing a short black skirt and a black T-shirt with skulls printed on it. She took a WikiLeaks T-shirt from her bag and tossed it at Assange.“That’s for you,” she said. “You need to change.” He put the T-shirt on a chair next to him, and continued working. Jonsdottir has been in parliament for about a year, but considers herself a poet, artist, writer, and activist. Her political views are mostly anarchist. “I was actually unemployed before I got this job,” she explained. “When we first got to parliament, the staff was so nervous: here are people who were protesting parliament, who were for revolution, and now we are inside. None of us had aspirations to be politicians. We have a checklist, and, once we’re done, we are out.” As she unpacked her computer, she asked Assange how he was planning to delegate the work on Project B. More Icelandic activists were due to arrive; half a dozen ultimately contributed time to the video, and about as many WikiLeaks volunteers from other countries were participating. Assange suggested that someone make contact with Google to insure that YouTube would host the footage.
More:
http://www.scribd.com/jordan_biren/d/83396877-WikiLeaks-Assange-New-Yorker

Mr. Applebaum is a developer for the Tor Project Inc., a Walpole, Mass., nonprofit that provides free tools that help people maintain their anonymity online. Tor’s tools are often used by people living in countries where Internet traffic is monitored by the government. Tor obtains some of its funding from the U.S. government.Mr. Appelbaum has also volunteered for WikiLeaks, which recommends people use Tor’s tools to protect their identities when submitting documents to its website. In April 2010, Mr. Appelbaum’s involvement in WikiLeaks was inadvertently disclosed publicly in a blog post on the website of the Committee to Protect Journalists. The reporter, Danny O’Brien, said Mr. Appelbaum had thought he was speaking anonymously. Mr. O’Brien said he later offered to remove Mr. Appelbaum’s name from the post. After the blog post appeared, Mr. Appelbaum became a public advocate for WikiLeaks.
More:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203476804576613284007315072.html

U.S. prosecutors accuse the four men of breaching copyright by facilitating millions of illegal downloads through their website, enriching themselves at the expense of movie makers and songwriters. They are accused of a number of offenses including racketeering, which carries a maximum prison sentence of 20 years.

As well as Dotcom, prosecutors are seeking the extradition from New Zealand of Finn Batato, Mathias Ortmann and Bram van der Kolk, each of whom held senior positions at Megaupload before authorities shut it down in January.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iUfqpQ7baiKkTmJUzHOUBX8EpYRQ

See also:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-31001_3-57390328-261/u.s-files-to-extradite-megauploads-kim-dotcom/

http://gizmodo.com/5890458/why-tv-everywhere-is-bogged-down-in-negotiations-and-pacts

…but it wants to share all of those choices, not just ones that the subscriber wants to share

http://www.zdnet.com/blog/home-theater/netflix-still-wants-to-share-all-of-your-viewing-activity-on-facebook/5702

http://www.zdnet.com/blog/feeds/us-government-sponsors-crowdsourcing-game-to-catch-international-crooks/4619

http://www.zdnet.com/blog/security/cbs-60-minutes-stuxnet-worm-opens-new-era-of-warfare/10468

No need to wait for Anonymous

http://www.channel4.com/news/android-apps-share-personal-data

http://www.techwireasia.com/2118/china-worlds-biggest-mobile-phone-population-but-still-has-plenty-of-room-to-grow/

All your pralines are belong to us

Dutch language news article

http://webwereld.nl/nieuws/109736/cybercopchef-gepowned-door-anonymous.html

Could have ‘blasted’ a bit earlier

The European Banking Authority (EBA) has come out against plans by web domain body ICANN to introduce new top level domains for the financial services industry, claiming they could lead to increased fraud through phishing attacks and other threats.

http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/251222/icann_plan_for_industry_domains_blasted_by_european_banks.html

Dutch language news article:
http://webwereld.nl/nieuws/109730/kpn-verliest-e-mails-gemeente-amsterdam.html

Mario Gianni Masiá, now the owner of an oceanfront vacation spot called “Camping Alfaques” in southern Spain, was a child in 1978 when a tanker truck exploded into a fireball on the road just beyond the site. 23 tons of fuel ignited, immediately turning 200 campers to ash and badly burning several hundred more. Safely on the other side of the camp, Mario was unscathed.

Photographers descended, of course; pictures were snapped, graphic shots of bodies stacked like charcoal, carbonized arms rising from the earth. Newspapers covered the deaths. A movie was made. But 30 years is a long time, and while memories of the disaster never vanished, visitors to the campground didn’t have the most shocking images shoved in their faces just for planning a trip.

Until two-and-half years ago, Mario says, when Google’s algorithm changed. Suddenly, right there in the top results for his vacation business, were black and white photos of charred human flesh. Mario has been trying ever since to convince Google that it needs to change this. He doesn’t suspect any malice on Google’s part, but neither is he willing to throw up his hands in the face of Google’s ranking equations.

“Algorithms can have errors,” he said when we spoke by phone this week. “Significant errors, like this one, have to be addressed.”

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2012/03/algorithms-can-have-errors-one-mans-quest-to-purge-horrific-pictures-from-his-google-results.ars

Previously:
http://vrritti.com/?s=algorithms