Archive for June, 2012

The world is slowly waking up…to find the ruins the bankers have left?

After two major scandals rocked the City this week, the Justice Secretary Ken Clarke said financial crime was “easier to get away with” than virtually any other misdemeanour.

And he insisted there should be criminal investigations and prosecutions where crimes have been committed.

He said: “We are very bad at prosecuting financial crime in this country. I suspect financial crime is easier to get away with in this country than practically any other sort of crime.

“This is still being investigated, no doubt, but once these investigations are complete, if they have committed criminal offences they should be brought to trial.”

Mr Clarke said some of the behaviour which came to light this week was “shocking”.

More:
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/4403565/Bring-crooked-bankers-to-justice-says-Ken-Clarke.html

http://www.computerworlduk.com/news/infrastructure/3367099/sec-may-force-nasdaq-upgrade-systems-after-facebook-ipo-debacle/

http://www.us-cert.gov/control_systems/pdf/ICS-CERT_Incident_Response_Summary_Report_09_11.pdf

Internet search giant Google has reached a deal under legal mediation with French anti-racism groups which objected to the search engine suggesting users add “Jew” to searches for prominent names.

Google users “are confronted daily by the unsolicited and almost systematic association of the word ‘Jew’ with the names of the best-known people in the world of politics, the media or business,” the groups said.

Under French law, it is illegal to record someone’s ethnicity in a database.

Searches conducted on Google.fr, including for example for President Francois Hollande, continued to offer the word “Jew” as a top suggestion on Wednesday.

Bernard Jouanneau, a lawyer for Memoire 2000, said the deal “identified areas of useful cooperation in the fight against racism and anti-Semitism that put an end to the dispute.”

Google also refused to comment on the specifics of the deal, but said it would be working with the anti-racism groups on public education projects.

More:
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gnkXhoqg1dwqfLBIwdwockJvZ3Iw

Google’s not pushing all this hardware into developers’ hands because it’s a hardware company. Hardware companies don’t give away hardware. That wouldn’t prove anything but that people like free hardware.

Google is in the position to make gigantic bets on hardware that ultimately are designed to get people to use its information services. Even its self-driving cars fit this model.

If you’re driving a car, you cannot (or should not) access the Internet or consume media. Not if you want to stay alive. The way this problem is solved by almost everyone: Make it illegal to message or view streams while driving. The way Google solves this problem: Make driving unnecessary so people can use the Net while they’re on the move.

It’s an extremely big bet, but the payoff is Google-scale: If the company can free up the time people spend driving so they can use it instead to be online, guess who wins?

More:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57464204-93/dont-believe-the-hardware-hype-googles-still-an-ad-company/

An agreement between four music companies and Eircom (Ireland’s principle telecommunications provider) for a graduated response potentially leading to the disconnection of copyright infringing subscribers, is to be reinstated.

The agreement between EMI Records (Ireland) LtdSony Music Entertainment Ireland LtdUniversal Music Ireland Ltd and Warner Music Ireland Ltd and the telecomms company calls for a week-long disconnection for subscribers who receive three warnings, and complete disconnection after four warnings. But this agreement was halted by the Irish Data Protection Commission last December after Eircom mistakingly sent around 300 warning letters to innocent subscribers.

The Data Protection Commission claimed that the agreement breached data protection and privacy laws – but this ruling was challenged in court by the music companies. Now Mr Justice Charleton at the Commercial Court has quashed the Commissioner’s ruling.

The judge decided that although the Commissioner’s December ruling was based on a privacy argument, the Commission had failed to demonstrate the privacy issues; and, according to the Irish Times, “the motivation behind the commissioner’s condemnation of any music company protecting its own interest against illegal downloading was not clear.”

For their part, the music companies claimed “the notice would effectively unwind their agreement with Eircom and argued it was an unlawful and irrational attempt to reopen data protection issues already determined by the courts in their favour.”

This ruling allows the music industry to rekindle their ‘three-strikes’ campaign against copyright infringers – something they have already said they will do.

http://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/view/26686/graduated-response-returns-to-ireland/

http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/131390.pdf

See also:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Union_patent

He said: “The internet has changed everything, people doing what comes naturally in these new, uncharted waters and suddenly they’re getting their collars felt by people who still have Hotmail addresses.”

http://www.4rfv.co.uk/nationalnews.asp?id=146650

See also:

At the end of the day, the people running Surfthechannel were profiting by stealing other people’s hard work.  They were killing jobs by stealing revenue from the people who put their creativity, effort and ideas into developing the new and innovative entertainment audiences love.  Undermining even a little of the success of their work now makes it substantially harder for them to create at all in the future.  Yesterday’s verdict is an important step toward making sure the storytellers who create content will be able to continue to do so.

http://blog.mpaa.org/BlogOS/post/2012/06/28/SurfTheChannel-Decision-A-Victory-for-Creative-Story-Telling.aspx

And:

Some People Still Have To Get Used To Laws, Judges And Jurisprudence. Internet And Regulation Don’t Mix Well
http://vrritti.com/2012/06/27/some-people-still-have-to-get-used-to-laws-judges-and-jurisprudence-internet-and-regulation-dont-mix-well/

http://www.alexa.com/topsites/countries;8/NL

Previously:

Pirate Bay On Stranger Tides: No Longer Among 100 Most Popular Websites In The Netherlands Due To Website Blocking Court Order
http://vrritti.com/2012/06/20/pirate-bay-on-stranger-tides-no-longer-among-100-most-popular-websites-in-the-netherlands-due-to-website-blocking-court-order/

Pirate Bay No Longer One Of Great Britain’s Top 100 Websites. Website Blocking Court Order Now In Full Effect In UK
http://vrritti.com/2012/06/24/pirate-bay-no-longer-one-of-great-britains-top-100-websites-website-blocking-court-order-now-in-full-effect-in-uk/

See also:
http://vrritti.com/?s=pirate+bay+blockade&submit=Search

A cloud that cannot handle lightning? 

More:
http://venturebeat.com/2012/06/29/amazon-outage-netflix-instagram-pinterest/

A University of Texas at Austin research team successfully demonstrated for the first time that the GPS signals of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), or drone, can be commandeered by an outside source — a discovery that could factor heavily into the implementation of a new federal mandate to allow thousands of civilian drones into the U.S. airspace by 2015.

Cockrell School of Engineering Assistant Professor Todd Humphreys and his students were invited by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to attempt the demonstration in White Sands, New Mexico in late June. Using a small but sophisticated UAV along with hardware and software developed by Humphreys and his students, the research team repeatedly overtook navigational signals going to the GPS-guided vehicle.

Known as “spoofing,” the technique creates false civil GPS signals that trick the vehicle’s GPS receiver into thinking nothing is amiss — even as it steers a new navigational course induced by the outside hacker. Because spoofing fools GPS receivers’ on both their location and time, some fear that most GPS-reliant devices, infrastructure and markets are vulnerable to attacks. That fear was underscored — but not proven — when a U.S. military drone disappeared over Iran late last year and showed up a week later, intact, and in the care of Iranians who claimed to have brought the vehicle down with spoofing.

The recent demonstration by University of Texas at Austin researchers is the first known unequivocal demonstration that commandeering a UAV via GPS spoofing is technically feasible.

“I think this demonstration should certainly raise some eyebrows and serve as a wake-up call of sorts as to how safe our critical infrastructure is from spoofing attacks,” said Milton R. Clary, a senior Department of Defense (DoD) Aviation Policy Analyst at Overlook Systems Technologies, which is working with the federal government to develop programs that identify and mitigate spoofing attacks.

During the spoofing demonstration at White Sands, the research team took control of a hovering UAV from about a kilometer away. Next year, they plan to perform a similar demonstration on a moving UAV from 10 kilometers away.

More:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-57464271-83/drones-can-be-hijacked-via-gps-spoofing-attack/

Long considered home to the worst commenters on the internet — racist, cruel, idiotic, nonsensical, and barely literate — YouTube is in the process of upgrading its comment system in order to better tame its most loathsome members.

Word of the overhaul slipped out during the Q&A portion of a YouTube developer session at Google I/O, the annual developers conference from the video-upload hub’s owner, Google.

A member of the audience, which was stocked heavily with online video publishers, asked for advice on handling negative comments within his YouTube channel. Dror Shimshowitz, a YouTube “head of product,” replied that “comments are kind of the Wild West of video” and can be turned off. But Google doesn’t like it when people do that, he said, because it cuts off the community. So the company is working on fixing the system.

“We’re working on some improvements to the comment system, so hopefully we’ll have an update on that in the next few months,” Shimshowitz said.

Shimshowitz declined to elaborate further in a follow-up interview, in which he was asked about the scope and nature of the planned changes. “We’re working to improve comments as much as we’re working to improve all parts of the site and YouTube experience,” a Google spokesman said, adding that the company would not comment further.

More:
http://www.wired.com/business/2012/06/youtube-commenters/

Credit Card Data of Hundreds of Thousands of Consumers Compromised, Millions of Dollars Lost to Fraud

More:
http://ftc.gov/opa/2012/06/wyndham.shtm

The global security analysis company Strategic Forecasting Inc will settle a class action lawsuit brought by one of its customers over a crippling attack by hackers who stole data of clients including Henry Kissinger, court documents show.

More:
http://in.reuters.com/article/2012/06/28/us-stratfor-hack-lawsuit-idINBRE85R03720120628

See also:
http://vrritti.com/?s=stratfor&submit=Search

http://www.zdnet.com/blog/foremski/lessons-from-cisco-the-corporation-as-media-company/2375

As the UK government consults on whether or not to force broadband ISPs into imposing default censorship of adult websites (here), it’s worth remembering just how ineffective such measures can be. One of the biggest problems is with internet search engines, such as Google and Microsoft’s Bing, which often maintain cached copies of related images and sometimes even videos.

Unfortunately all that it takes to bypass such censorship, even on ISPs like TalkTalk, is for a child to simply click off the search engines content filter. That should be a no-brainer for most kids, especially since few parents will have bothered to setup an account and even then you only have to swap web browsers, enable privacy mode or clear some cookies to avoid it.

On top of that there are multiple other ways to circumvent the skin-deep level of blocking imposed by ISPs, which future generations will now surely educate themselves about and thus risk turning the current efforts into a waste of time. We exposed many these problems in our recent article – How to Keep Your Data Private and Browse the Internet Anonymously .

Even TalkTalk has now admitted, in a comment to PCPro, that such filtering is far from perfect. The ISPs HomeSafe solution, which is often praised by the government and mistakenly called the only network-level solution (actually quite a few filters can work at the network-level, such as the free OpenDNS), has been in the news before for failing to do its job properly (here).

HomeSafe’s blocking, like similar services, is often also wildly inconsistent; the option to restrict Social Network access affects Facebook and Twitter but not Google+ and many other sites. But none of these problems are unique to a single ISP.

Most young children do not seek out porn? Well granted, most under a certain age probably wouldn’t but once you reach the pre-teen / early teens and you’re a boy.. well.. good luck stopping that. How quickly some people forget their own youth.

More:
http://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.php/2012/06/google-and-bing-help-children-to-bypass-uk-isp-based-adult-website-blocks.html

The Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission have sharpened their focus on high- frequency and algorithmic trading since May 6, 2010, when about $862 billion was erased from stock values in 20 minutes before share prices recovered from the plunge.

More:
http://www.infowars.com/computers-on-wall-street-are-buying-and-selling-to-themselves/

See also:
http://vrritti.com/?s=algorithm&submit=Search

No one will be imprisoned for this colossal abuse of the financial system. No one will pay in anything approaching a proportionate level to the damage done.

More:
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danielknowles/100168006/is-it-time-to-consider-locking-up-bankers/

http://gizmodo.com/5922300/outmywindow-a-movie-studio-creates-another-photo-sharing-service

Private is the new public

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/06/south-carolina-passes-bill-against-municipal-broadband/

In 2006, a hacker going by the name “DerEngel” (“The Angel”) wrote a book for respected tech publishers No Starch Press on Hacking the Cable Modem. The book came with a warning: “The practice of modifying a cable modem violates service agreements, and hackers risk being banned by service providers for life. This book is not intended to be used for stealing Internet service or any other illegal activity.” It was intended, you know, for research. Not for stealing Internet access.

An early review of the book noted this warning didn’t seem to fit with the tone of the text, which repeatedly implied “that uncapping, MAC [Media Access Control] cloning, and evading detection is a noble pursuit.” (Though one section did include “recommendations to ISP engineers on how to improve their systems to more easily defeat and detect cable modem hackers.”)

The feds weren’t buying the “research” angle, either; they were convinced that DerEngel was running the country’s largest cable modem hacking operation, showing thousands of people around the country how to get free or higher-speed service from local Internet providers. And they were going to stop it.

More:
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/06/how-the-angel-helped-15000-people-steal-broadband/

http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2012/06/breaking-judge-grants-apple-an-injunction-against-the-galaxy-nexus/

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/06/ryan-harris-sentencing/

Political activist group Demand Progress has filed a brief in the Megaupload case, urging the court to disregard the MPAA’s concerns over the return of data to former Megaupload users. The group argues that Hollywood lobbyists are out to make it impossible for Megaupload users to access their property, effectively using the court case as a backdoor SOPA.

More:
http://torrentfreak.com/mpaa-using-megaupload-case-as-backdoor-sopa-court-hears-120628/

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/06/28/scotland_yard_issues_extradition_notice_to_julian_assange/

A phone-hacker who struck again by running up close to £10,000 worth of premium-line bills has been jailed for 18 months.

Computer expert Dariusz Ganski, of Sunny Bank, Kingswood, used a router to tap into BT phone boxes and made hours of calls to expensive numbers.

More:
http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/Hacker-10-000-worth-calls-public-phone-boxes/story-16446867-detail/story.html

There are a lot of cool things you can do with $1,000, but scientists at an Austin, Texas college have come across one that is often overlooked: for less than a grand, how’d you like to hijack a drone?

A group of researchers led by Professor Todd Humphreys from the University of Texas at Austin Radionavigation Laboratory recently succeeded in raising the eyebrows of the US government. With just around $1,000 in parts, Humphreys’ team took control of an unmanned aerial vehicle owned by the college, all in front of the US Department of Homeland Security.

After being challenged by his lab, the DHS dared Humphreys’ crew to hack into a drone and take command. Much to their chagrin, they did exactly that.

Humphrey tells Fox News that for a few hundreds dollar his team was able to “spoof” the GPS system on board the drone, a technique that involves mimicking the actual signals sent to the global positioning device and then eventually tricking the target into following a new set of commands. And, for just $1,000, Humphreys says the spoofer his team assembled was the most advanced one ever built.

“Spoofing a GPS receiver on a UAV is just another way of hijacking a plane,” Humphreys tells Fox. The real danger here, however, is that the government is currently considering plans that will allow local law enforcement agencies and other organizations from coast-to-coast to control drones of their own in America’s airspace.

More:
http://rt.com/usa/news/texas-1000-us-government-906/

Everything new from Google is prima facie fantastic, and served with the best intentions. Google is a monolithic company, sure, but it’s filled with geniuses who want to make your life easier through technology. Nobody’s faulting their ambition, or questioning its motives.

But we have to wonder: Are these new things meant for regular people, or the data-obsessed, grace-deficient Silicon Valley nerd vanguard? As much as we wish it weren’t so, the answer seems a whole hell of a lot like the latter.

That the company responsible for Android is still building for robots. In each case, Google has balanced on golden fingers a product—clearly with a lot of time, thought, and money behind it—that just doesn’t seem to jibe with the way we actually live our lives.

There isn’t any lack of effort or innovation here, but rather a gaping disconnect between the way data geeks and the rest of us see the world.

Much more:
http://gizmodo.com/5921823/does-google-have-any-social-skills-at-all

http://gizmodo.com/5922208/scientist-invent-mind+reading-machine-that-lets-you-type-with-your-brain

http://gizmodo.com/5922233/childless-couple-turns-to-twitter-to-spread-story-of-struggle-to-adopt

Turns out the home had an open WiFi router, and the threats had been made by someone outside the house. Whoops.

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/06/swat-team-throws-flashbangs-raids-wrong-home-due-to-open-wifi-network/

In 2009, over 6,000 Americans received such National Security Letters (NSLs).

According to the Wall Street Journal, the “letters show that the FBI is now informing people who receive the letters how they can challenge the documents in court. But some key elements of the letters remain blocked from view—including lists of material the FBI says companies can send in response to the letter.”

Most commonly, government investigators request names and addresses associated with phone and Internet records. There are also some especially broad requests, including “electronic communications transactional records,” and “Internet activity logs.” However, it remains unclear exactly what those terms mean, and how companies comply or don’t comply with such requests is also a mystery.

Much more:
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/06/foia-request-forces-doj-to-reveal-national-security-letter-templates/

http://gizmodo.com/5921959/lawyerbots-given-the-green-light-in-the-us

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/06/why-your-isp-cares-about-the-law-of-the-sea/

Besides new rules on contract law and dispute resolution, the most important amendments mentioned in the legislative proposal are:

  • Creators and performing artists are allowed to dissolve the agreement with the operator of their rights prematurely. For example, when the production is not expoited: a non-use clause. Now, most of the times only the operator is allowed to prematurely dissolve an agreement. Furthermore, contract terms that prove to be unreasonable towards creative staff can be voidable under the new law.
  • Individual creators are entitled to a fair compensation for the transfer of their rights or when they grant a license. This principle is also expressly introduced for people that have significantly contributed to film productions. Rights are no longer automatically concentrated around producers.
  • The creator can claim a higher compensation for unexpected bestsellers. That is the case when, for example,  the pay agreed with authors and or performing artists is disproportionately low in comparison to the revenue generated by successful exploitation of a work.

The new framework is designed to strengthen the position of authors, performing artists and other creative staff vis-a-vis the party that exploits their work. The Dutch government is of the opinion that their interests and contributions are often poorly protected and underpaid. This problem has to be legally recognized, according to the department of Justice.

From an international perspective, an important observation is that the current legal developments in the Netherlands could deviate from the law in other EU member states, were copyrights and related right to audiovisual works are mostly centered around the producer and were bestseller or non-use provisions may not be common. This may require multinational companies to assess whether their contracts for the Dutch market are still compliant with the law, once it is revised.

More:
http://www.futureofcopyright.com/home/blog-post/2012/06/28/amendments-to-dutch-copyright-law-aim-to-strengthen-position-of-creators-and-performing-artists.html