Archive for 2012/07/19

His lawyers have asked the United States courts to dismiss charges against the company, saying there is no ability for the courts to remotely charge the Hong Kong-registered company with a crime.

Dotcom’s San Francisco-based lawyer Ira Rothken today confirmed the papers had been filed.

Copies of the motion were posted on Dotcom’s and Mr Rothken’s twitter feeds.

They allege: “It seems beyond dispute that Megaupload has been deprived of its property, has had its reputation tarnished, and has had its business destroyed by the Government’s actions in this case”.

More:

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10820752

Suvorov, 28, was sentenced by U.S. District Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein in Central Islip, N.Y. Suvorov was an accomplice to Albert Gonzalez, one of the most prolific identity thieves ever prosecuted by the U.S. government.

Suvorov pleaded guilty in May 2009 to a wire fraud conspiracy charge, filed in the Eastern District of New York, for hacking into the national restaurant chain Dave & Buster’s and stealing more than 80,000 credit card numbers. In addition, Suvorov pleaded guilty in November 2011 to a trafficking in unauthorized access devices charge, originally filed in the Southern District of California, related to the sale of more than 160,000 stolen credit card numbers to an undercover agent with the U.S. Secret Service. The cases were consolidated in the Eastern District of New York for sentencing. In addition to his prison term, Suvorov was ordered to pay $675,000 in restitution and to satisfy a $300,000 asset forfeiture judgment stemming from the New York charges.

“Mr. Suvorov participated in a scheme to sell thousands of credit card numbers stolen from unsuspecting consumers,” said Assistant Attorney General Breuer. “Computer hackers like Mr. Suvorov victimize businesses and individuals, posing a serious threat to their financial security. Today’s sentence sends a clear message that cyber criminals operating abroad will suffer severe consequences for their crimes.”

“Suvorov reached across an ocean to victimize thousands of Americans,” said U.S. Attorney Lynch. “That ocean was no protection from the reach of U.S. law enforcement, whose coordinated efforts put a stop to Suvorov and his cohorts’ criminal scheme. He will now serve his sentence in the country of his victims. Computer hackers and identity thieves who prey on innocent American consumers, businesses and financial institutions will find no refuge from U.S. criminal justice in any corner of the globe.”

More:

http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2012/July/12-crm-885.html

Who takes any responsibility online nowadays anyway?

Dutch language news article:


http://webwereld.nl/nieuws/111219/ssl-aanbieders–piratensites-zijn-niet-te-voorkomen.html

Previously:

A new twist in the websites seized in Project Copy Cat involved the appearance of Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) certificates. SSL certificates provide authentication for financial information, meaning consumers should be able to trust that they are sending information to the intended server and not to a criminal’s server. Trusted SSL providers should only issue SSL certificates to verified companies that have gone through several identity checks. In addition to providing authentication, SSL certificates also provide encryption, enhancing the security of credit card numbers, usernames, passwords and other sensitive information. These websites, however, displayed SSL certificates, further duping the consumer into thinking they were shopping on a legitimate website, potentially putting customers’ financial information at risk.

More:

http://www.ice.gov/news/releases/1207/120712washington.htm

A digital flashmob

More:

http://torrentfreak.com/pirates-want-to-go-legal-but-convenience-choice-availability-come-first-120719/

Disruptive innovation? ;-)

More:

http://torrentfreak.com/megaupload-u-s-government-trying-to-rewrite-the-rules-120719/

Chet Kanojia is relatively unknown but his Internet service may have changed the way people access broadcast TV.

Aereo captures freely available over-the-air broadcast signals and then sends the programming over the Internet to Web-connected devices. The $12-per-month subscription service is only available in New York, but the company plans to expand soon.

Why would consumers pay for something that they can access free of charge? Well, when was the last time you clambered up to the roof to install a TV antenna? If you get the networks programming via a cable company, you end up paying for those channels and perhaps hundreds more you don’t care about for ten times what Kanojia is asking. Either way, you still can’t access much of the networks’ content via the Web — not without Aereo. Did I mention that Aereo, backed by media mogul Barry Diller, offers a DVR system?

More:

http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57475141-93/aereos-founder-has-broadcast-tv-in-a-headlock-now-what-q-a/


http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/07/its-legal-cops-seize-cell-phone-impersonate-owner/

The British music trade body, BPI has requested the deletion of more illegal online music files in the last six months than in the whole of 2011.

Now it is turning its attention to Google for listing pirate websites in search results.

Google says it already removes two million links a month on requests from rights holders

More & video:


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-18896983

Previously:

Court May Order Google to Censor ‘Torrent,’ ‘RapidShare’ and ‘Megaupload’

http://vrritti.com/2012/07/18/court-may-order-google-to-censor-torrent-rapidshare-and-megaupload/

Dear Hollywood,

The Internet frightens you. But history has taught us that the greatest innovations were built on rejections. The VCR frightened you, but it ended up making billions of dollars in video sales.

You get so comfortable with your ways of doing business that any change is perceived as a threat. The problem is, we as a society don’t have a choice: The law of human nature is to communicate more efficiently. And the economic benefits of high-speed Internet and unlimited cloud storage are so great that we need to plan for the day when the transfer of terabytes of data will be measured in seconds.

Businesses and individuals will keep looking for faster connectivity, more robust online storage and more privacy. Transferring large pieces of content over the Internet will become common — not because global citizens are evil but because economic forces leading to “speed of light” data transfer and storage are so beneficial to societal growth.

Come on, guys, I am a computer nerd. I love Hollywood and movies. My whole life is like a movie.

I wouldn’t be who I am if it wasn’t for the mind-altering glimpse at the future in Star Wars. I am at the forefront of creating the cool stuff that will allow creative works to thrive in an Internet age. I have the solutions to your problems. I am not your enemy.

Providing “freemium” cloud storage to society is not a crime. What will Hollywood do when smartphones and tablets can wirelessly transfer a movie file within milliseconds?

The very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common. Instead of changing their views to fit the facts, they try to change the facts to fit their views. The fact remains that the benefits of Megaupload to society outweigh the burdens. But instead of adapting, you imported one of your action-conspiracy movie scripts into the real world. In my view, MPAA CEO and former Sen. Chris Dodd lobbied his friends in the White House to turn me into a villain who has to be destroyed. Due process? Rule of law? Eliminate me and my innovation and worry about the consequences later. Never mind that millions of Megaupload users lost access to cloud data like their wedding photos. Well done, Hollywood, everyone with similar innovations got the message. But wait … You did not read the end of the script.

The people of the Internet will unite. They will help me. And they are stronger than you. We will prevail in the war for Internet freedom and innovation that you have launched. We have logic, human nature and the invisible hand on our side.

As you should have known, our Mega services operated within the boundaries of the law. We had users that spanned from the military to Hollywood to lawyers and doctors. If you are unhappy with that, it is up to you to convince Congress to amend legislation. You tried with SOPA and you failed. As an alternative, you chose to lobby the Justice Department to ignore the law and stage a global show of force and destruction. The only parties a New Zealand court has found to have violated the law in this case are the local police and the FBI.

Regardless of the issues you have with new technologies, you can’t just engage armed forces halfway around the world, rip a peaceful man from his family, throw him in jail, terminate his business without a trial, take everything he owns without a hearing, deprive him of a fair chance to defend himself and do all that while your propaganda machine is destroying him in the media. Is that who you want to be?

There can still be a happy ending. I am working on solutions. Just call me or my lawyers. You know where to find me. Unfortunately I can only do lunch in New Zealand.

This open letter is free of copyright. Use it freely.

Source:

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/kim-dotcom-megaupload-extradition-350605

Beatz, husband of R&B superstar Alicia Keys, was previously listed as Megaupload’s CEO but the authorities say he is refusing to cooperate with the investigation.

“After Defendant Dotcom became Defendant Megaupload’s Chief Innovation Officer, the company appears to have employed at least two Chief Executive Officers in the United States: first David Robb and then Kasseem David Dean (also known as Swizz Beatz),” the filing reads.

Beatz officially represented Megaupload before the United States Trade Representative, when it was accused of being a piracy haven December last year.

“Delivering a summons to Mr. Dean, a resident of the United States, in his capacity as apparent Chief Executive Officer should also constitute proper service of process upon an officer of the company”


http://torrentfreak.com/feds-drag-rapper-swizz-beatz-into-megapload-case-120718/

Not for profit rights group Fight for the Future will on Thursday launch the Internet Defense League, a new initiative designed to help internet stakeholders fight back whenever their rights are threatened by the man.

The League will launch tonight in San Francisco, Washington DC, New York, London and, bizarrely, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia, by shining its trademark cat logo into the sky.

More:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/19/internet_defense_league_launch/


http://www.businesswire.com/news/mcafee/20120718005408/en/McAfee-Report-Highlights-Critical-Improved-Energy-Grid

The keychain in Apple iOS devices is intended as secure storage for sensitive
user data that should be protected even if an attacker has physical access to the
device. Therefore, the keychain stores secrets for services used by the operating
system (e.g., WiFi passwords, VPN credentials, etc.) but also credentials stored
by 3rd party apps.

The protection of the keychain is of vital concern for device users, as an unauthorized
access to contained passwords, keys and digital identities may be used
to access sensitive data, to cause loss of data and may inflict financial loss.

With the previous publication on Practical Consideration of iOS Device Encryption
Security the risks should be highlighted that accompany losing a locked
iOS device regarding confidentiality of passwords stored in the keychain [HB11].

The paper presented results of hands on tests that showed the possibility for
attackers to reveal some of the keychain entries. For the described approach,
the knowledge of the user’s secret passcode was not needed, as the protection
provided by the passcode was bypassed.

As intended, the publication of our findings has provided the possibility for a
public discussion on the iOS keychain security. Also others have found weaknesses
in the keychain concept, but seem to have chosen to keep this for their
own [For11]. However, the general reaction we observed as the result of the
publication was very positive. Many requests on further details and other aspects
have provided the opportunity to increase the knowledge about the provided
protection.

This paper should provide answers from our perspective to many important
questions arisen from the initial publication. As for the initial publication, the
intention is to provide as much insights as possible to enable others to understand
and evaluate the impact of the observed security design, but without
causing too many benefits for the wrong hands.

Much more:

http://sit.sit.fraunhofer.de/studies/en/sc-iphone-passwords-faq.pdf


http://www.zdnet.com/access-journalism-and-the-silicon-valley-reporter-7000001163/

Last year, 25-year-old Brad Stephenson found a loophole in one of Nike’s websites and decided to take advantage. Over the span of five months, he used accounts meant for professional athletes to steal Nike merchandise worth over $80,000.

More:

http://www.zdnet.com/nike-hacker-steals-over-80000-7000001177/


http://www.infowars.com/human-corpses-harvested-in-multimillion-dollar-trade/


http://www.infowars.com/law-enforcement-and-marketers-buying-your-smart-phone-tracking-data/


http://gizmodo.com/5927274/hollywood+backed-ios-app-vyclone-pioneers-social-filmmaking


http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57475354-93/senator-says-apple-e-book-suit-has-empowered-monopolists/


http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/07/wikileaks-calls-for-donations-dares-visamastercard-to-shut-them-down/

The Electronic Frontier Foundation has released redacted copies of key documents in a constitutional challenge to national security letters (NSLs). These controversial legal tools give the FBI warrantless access to private customer information held by businesses. The law gives the FBI the power to ban a business receiving an NSL from disclosing its existence, but EFF contends that this runs afoul of the First Amendment.

The challenge is being brought by a telephone company that does business in California. Not much else is known about it. The Wall Street Journal speculates that the company may be Credo, a wireless reseller. Its parent company is Working Assets, known for giving millions of dollars to liberal groups, including the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

News of the case surfaced only this week, but the NSL at the heart of the dispute was sent to the company early last year. When the firm objected, the government filed a complaint seeking to compel the firm to comply. With support from EFF, the company responded by challenging the constitutionality not only of the specific letter but of the entire NSL statute.

Much more:

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/07/eff-says-fbi-gag-orders-violate-service-providers-free-speech-rights/


http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/07/faceless-freedom-youtube-adds-face-bluring-tool/