1. Frank Leenders. Claims that he has been sexually abused and raped by Joris Demmink at the age of 4 or 5 (in or around 1979 in the Czech Republic), and at the age of 13 or 14 (in or around 1989 in The Netherlands) and at different intervals between 1979 and 1989 when Leenders was ‘active’ as a male prostitute. His father allegedly ran a brothel where young boys were provided to paying customers. Law enforcement officers did not believe his accusations. After a series of interrogations of Leenders, the public prosecutor’s office in The Netherlands decided to publish a press release making clear that the accusations were false. The announcement was allegedly made one hour before Leenders decided to sign a statement that he had made false accusations against Joris Demmink. In July 2004 Leenders would be convicted by a Court of Law for filing a false criminal complaint.
2. Hüseyin Baybaşin. Portrayed by Wikipedia as Europe’s Pablo Escobar. He claims that he was and still is incarcerated in The Netherlands allegedly as a result of the Turkish government putting pressure on Joris Demmink, using information about Demmink’s alleged sexual abuse of minors (during visits to Turkey from 1995 to 2000, while making use of multiple aliases) to move him to act against Baybasin, who in turn would be able to disclose sensitive information about Turkish government officials engaging in drug trafficking activities. The evidence and complaint Baybasin has put forward has been regarded by the Dutch Court of Law as non-relevant as Baybasin is not a victim of Demmink’s alleged abuse himself. Fact remains that Joris Demmink has paid a visit to Baybasin’s prison facility in the past, resulting in Baybasin being put in isolation for the duration of the visit. Another issue is the alleged tampering with intercepted telephone communications of Baybasin as well as faulty transcripts of those communications by enforcement officials.
3 & 4. Mustafa Y. & Osman B. Quote: “It has been well-documented that two Turkish boys, Osman B. and Mustafa Y., filed separate criminal charges against Demmink for sexual abuse and rape in the mid-1990s, when they were 11- and 14-years-old, respectively. These allegations were never properly prosecuted in accordance with Dutch criminal law. Indeed, Dutch authorities never even investigated the criminal charges filed by Mustafa against Demmink in September 2008 and May 2010. Dutch authorities dismissed the allegations after demanding that Mustafa first had to travel to the Netherlands to officially answer their questions, an impossible request to a young Turkish citizen of meager means. Meanwhile the boy was heavily threatened and abused in Turkey (his tongue was cut with a razor blade), in an effort to quash his complaint. Pressure intensified against him to withdraw his charges against Demmink, which the boy never did. Osman B. also filed a criminal charge against Demmink in May 2010. He was able to marshal resources and travel to the Netherlands, where he was interrogated in February 2011. However, as with the other criminal complaints against Demmink, a thorough criminal investigation following the Dutch Code of Criminal Procedure was never even initiated. Five witnesses (including a law enforcement officer and a reporter) with direct knowledge about this crime were waiting in Turkey to be interviewed by Dutch prosecutors, but they were ignored.”
5. A third Turkish boy called Yacine. He also was willing to give evidence in Turkey to Dutch authoritites.
Could it be that the Dutch and Turkish authorities are entangled in a web of intrigue around these issues? Has Turkey decided to keep mum about Demmink’s actions in return for the lengthy incarceration of Baybasin? Could it be that the accusers are being regarded as ‘lesser victims’ because of their background, societal status, reputation or lack thereof?
In any event, due to the sensitive issues at hand as well as the fact that Demmink remains at the absolute center of power for the time being, Dutch society, news media as well as its many politicians seem in a state of shock and appear to be unable to even casually address the issue, as this video will demonstrate:
Formally, many of the people in this video outrank Joris Demmink. Any government official who would embarrass his superiors to such a degree would normally step down on his own accord. Alternatively, any Minister who would be put to shame time and again due to the presumed activities of his own staff member, would have fired that employee a long time ago. Especially when he’s not the only Minister suffering from the consequences of the Demmink’s alleged behavior.
Update: the Dutch whistleblower website http://www.klokkenluideronline.net domain has been taken down by authorities. Links containing that domain name can now be found on klokkenluideronline.is. They may also still be available via archive.org or Google’s Cache.
Dutch language news articles:
Update (this article contains a list of relevant victims, witnesses and news media that have reported on the alleged pedophile activities of Joris Demmink): http://www.nieuwslog.nl/2012/10/27/peter-r-de-vries-complotdenker/
HM Queen Beatrix Of The Netherlands To Pay Tribute To Alleged Pedophile And Justice Secretary General Joris Demmink
Evil flourishes when good men do nothing. When self-preservation has become more important than truth (Savile Case & Demmink Case)
For the victims, Dutch Justice Ministry Secretary General Joris Demmink is apparently above the law in the Netherlands
Matthijs Kaaks, Lawyer in Amsterdam: With The Dutch Minister Of Justice Proactively Eliminating Any Guilt Of His Secretary General Joris Demmink, He Is Putting Himself Into The Position Of A Judge
Two Turkish Men Start Article 12 Procedure Against Dutch Secretary General Joris Demmink. Want Judge To Force Prosecution
Three Possible Reasons Why The Secretary General of The Dutch Justice Joris Demmink Is Said To Be Untouchable
How The Dutch Government Should Have Dealt With The Joris Demmink Case. A Contingency Plan For Future Catastrophes
“Joris Demmink Was Not In Turkey During The Time The Alleged Charges Occurred”. Dutch Blog Begs To Differ And Calls On Dutch Minister Of Justice To Disprove Their Evidence
The U.S. State Department has launched a vocal defense of a high government official in the Netherlands accused of raping young boys
Who Are The Individuals Accusing Joris Demmink Of Unlawful Acts? What Are The Accusations About?
“U.S. Congress must take steps to bar Joris Demmink from entering the United States and to freeze Demmink’s U.S.-based assets”
Transcript Of Censored NOS News Broadcast About Joris Demmink, 5th November 2003. “He did not always ask of what age they were”
Yet Another Dutch Reporter Dares To Speak Out. Henk Rijkers: “Under Normal Circumstances They Would Have Put Demmink Behind Bars A Long Time Ago”
New Evidence Is 2 Days Old And Already Dutch Secret Service, Internal Affairs And Public Prosecutor’s Office Conclude It Is NOT Necessary To Investigate Joris Demmink
Dutch Secretary General And Alleged Pedophile Joris Demmink To Sue Dutch Newspaper Algemeen Dagblad. Distraction Technique?
Former Dutch Minister Of Justice Piet Hein Donner Had Been Warned About Joris Demmink. Officials Criticize Actions Of Enforcement Authorities
Dutch Parliament Demands Explanation About Demmink Case From Minister Of Justice Ivo Opstelten
New Witnesses Come Forward. Declare That Dutch Secretary General Joris Demmink Was In Touch With A Dutch Criminal Who Acted As His Pimp
Dutch Minister Of Justice Ivo Opstelten Continues To Support His Highest Ranking Government Official, The Alleged Pedophile Joris Demmink
Dutch Ministry Of Justice Tacitly Admitted That No Thorough Investigation Into Alleged Pedophile Joris Demmink Has Taken Place (Video)