vRRitti.com, providing sentiency

It is a salutary warning for police practitioners of the need to keep on the alert and make sure that the many steps that have been put in place since the ’70s and ’80s actually are going to work as best they can.

We are living in a different world to the 1970s in terms of our understanding of child sexual abuse and our tolerance of it.

– PETER DAVIES, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE CHILD EXPLOITATION AND ONLINE PROTECTION CENTRE (CEOP)

http://www.itv.com/news/update/2012-10-29/child-protection-chief-wants-lessons-to-be-learned-from-savile-scandal/

“Multi-purpose orphanage” where children with disabilities and behavioral issues were allegedly raped and tortured. And investigators were driven from the island…

Update: the Dutch whistleblower website http://www.klokkenluideronline.net domain has been taken down by authorities. Links containing that domain name can now be found on klokkenluideronline.is. They may also still be available via archive.org or Google’s Cache.

English and Dutch language source material:

http://leahmcgrathgoodman.com/2012/06/29/anarchy-in-the-uk/

http://leahmcgrathgoodman.com/2012/09/11/celebrating-one-year-anniversary-of-my-uk-ban/

http://xandrah.wordpress.com/2012/09/16/schokkend-martelingen-en-verkrachtigen-v-weeskinderen-op-jersey-het-duistere-eiland-mega-cover-up/

http://aangirfan.blogspot.nl/2008/03/jersey-child-abuse-link-to-islington.html

http://www.klokkenluideronline.net/artikel/18990/verkrachtig-kinderen-op-elite-eiland

See also:

Savile’s Hunting Ground Duncroft Was Visited by Celebrities, Film Stars, Minor Royalty, All Sorts Of People According To Meirion Jones, Producer BBC Newsnight
http://vrritti.com/2012/10/28/saviles-hunting-ground-duncroft-was-visited-by-celebrities-film-stars-minor-royalty-all-sorts-of-people-according-to-meirion-jones-producer-bbc-newsnight/

The royal family are either awaiting more information in order to comment from a more informed perspective or they are panicking (Savile Case)
http://vrritti.com/2012/10/28/the-royal-family-are-either-awaiting-more-information-in-order-to-comment-from-a-more-informed-perspective-or-they-are-panicking/

Still Wondering Why The Netherlands Is A Hub For Human Trafficking And Sexual Abuse Of Children? Here’s One Answer

In a lengthy and amazingly ‘woolly’ news article published by Dutch newspaper Trouw, two Dutch sexologists Erik Van Beek and Rik Van Lunsen elaborate on their preferred approach to the pedophile problem.

In summary:

1.  They argue that ‘virtual’ (as in not real, artificially made, computer generated) child abuse images could have beneficial effects when treating pedofiles in mental institutions. They do argue that those images should be produced by bona fide producers and should carry an official sign of approval. However, Van Beek also argues that those virtual child abuse images should be easily accessible, without any negative consequences for the person acquiring them, so that the offering of virtual child abuse images could compete with the illegal offering of real child abuse images and perhaps disrupt latter market. Such a theory does carry with it the precondition that pedophiles everywhere should be able to access it, including online environments. Since – due to technological prowess – it’s very difficult to differentiate virtual from non-virtual child abuse images nowadays, this suggestion seems to be one of the most stupid ideas ever brought forward by a ‘specialist’ in this field.

2. According to the ‘experts’, the very activity of watching child abuse images does NOT increase the chance of a pedophile actually engaging in child abuse itself. However, they DO claim that if pedophiles are being prevented from watching that material, chances of them engaging in actual child abuse activities WILL increase.

Furthermore, the article tries to convince the reader to have some sympathy with pedophiles. As such it states:

“Those who are longing for child pornography, have a big problem. Because that’s illegal” (Duh! Everyone who is longing for something illegal has a problem. Let’s give a bank robber some fake money, maybe that’ll help?)

“One cannot offer them (pedophiles) anything, because as soon as the material gets too real, it’s illegal” (Why do you think that is, Einstein?)

“One should offer the virtual child pornography to the group that doesn’t want to hurt children and, when experiencing these stimuli, will not hurt anyone. One allows them to play in their garden of lust, so to speak”

And then the most brilliant quote from the mouth of Erik van Beek: “The only good reason to ban child pornography is that the production of it requires the abuse of children” (yeah…right….so people watching children being abused , even when the CGI version cannot be differentiated from the real thing – because it has to cause the proper stimuli – is just peachy??)

The article does offer one piece of information that is very useful. Apparently, and unconsciously, the therapists are really and sort of desperately looking for ways to help out their patients. And they hope and believe that by allowing pedophiles to indulge in their vices, if only just a tiny bit and in a controlled environment and with use of ‘virtual’ child pornography, the problem will be contained in the best way possible. However, at one point during the article Rik van Lunsen does acknowledge that:

Pedophiles cannot be converted. Their sexual preference has been locked before they’re eight years of age.

Who knows, maybe such an approach could work to make life more bearable for both the pedophiles that are emprisoned or hospitalized and the prison and hospital staff as well. But please don’t litter the internet with ‘virtual’ child abuse images, as something like ‘virtual’ child abuse images probably doesn’t even exists…It’s almost like giving drug addicts government approved medication which has the same effect as heroin, and then distribute the alternative drugs on the streets to have it compete with the illegal offering out there.

And in this case, it will be very hard for internet users to see the difference between real and virtual child abuse images, especially if the virtual images are supposed to have the same ‘impact’ on these predators. And ‘signs of approval’ are easily counterfeited too.

All of this could only result in a thriving new legal and illegal market for ‘virtual’ or who knows, perhaps even ‘virtualized’ child abuse images. That’s certainly not helpful to say the least.

Oh and according to Rik van Lunsen, Marc Dutroux and Robert Mikelsons are just spectres and huge exceptions to the rule. And they’re much more psychopaths than they are pedophiles.

Keep calm and carry on…

Dutch language news article:
http://www.trouw.nl/tr/nl/4516/Gezondheid/article/detail/3339011/2012/10/29/Virtuele-pedoporno-als-remedie.dhtml

Previously:

And Then There Are Always Idiots Like Brendan O’Neill: If You Were Abused By Jimmy Savile, Maybe You Should Keep It To Yourself
http://vrritti.com/2012/10/27/and-then-there-are-always-idiots-like-brendan-oneill-if-you-were-abused-by-jimmy-savile-maybe-you-should-keep-it-to-yourself/

People Are Getting Nervous. Stop the witch hunt for Jimmy Savile’s pals, says comic Jim Davidson
http://vrritti.com/2012/10/28/people-are-getting-nervous-stop-the-witch-hunt-for-jimmy-saviles-pals-says-comic-jim-davidson/

Police have been given the names of doctors who are accused of being in league with Jimmy Savile.

One doctor allegedly ‘collaborated’ with the BBC star in selecting child patients to rape at Leeds General Infirmary.

Two others worked alongside him at Stoke Mandeville, the Buckinghamshire hospital where nurses warned children to ‘pretend to be asleep’ when Savile toured the wards.

Yesterday a child-abusing retired Stoke Mandeville consultant, Dr Michael Salmon, was in hiding after a woman reported him to police for allegedly groping her in 1982. The woman, now 42, told the Mail that Dr Salmon, who displayed a Jim’ll Fix It picture in his office, squeezed her breast while pretending to check her heartbeat to treat her migraines. She said: ‘I was only 12 but quite well endowed. I was so shocked.’

Eight years later, in 1990, the paediatrician was jailed for indecently assaulting three other girls, two aged 13 and one of 17. He served three years in prison and now lives in retirement with his wife Mary, 70, in a £750,000 cottage in the heart of the New Forest in Hampshire.

A woman told yesterday how she was raped by Savile at Stoke Mandeville where he wore a T-shirt that read: ‘Sex Instructor, first lesson free’.

Salmon, 77, was ‘unavailable’ for comment, said his wife, adding: ‘He is not here. He has gone away.’

A neighbour said Salmon had been keeping a low profile recently, adding: ‘He has been trying to avoid journalists for the past couple of weeks.’

Dr Raymond Brown, who worked as a consultant paediatrician with Salmon, said the doctor would have known Savile because everyone at Stoke Mandeville knew him. The hospital has refused to answer a long list of questions put by the Mail, including whether the £40 million Savile raised for it made him ‘untouchable’.

At Leeds General Infirmary, two former women patients have come forward to name a doctor. He is accused of ‘brutal rape’. The National Association for  People Abused in Childhood charity said: ‘One of the victims has  said Jimmy and this doctor used to collaborate in choosing girls and taking them somewhere else to abuse them.’ Leeds General Infirmary said it had ‘not been passed any information about a specific allegation or the name of an individual, so understandably we cannot say any more about this.’

Stoke Mandeville said it was ‘shocked and saddened to hear of the very serious allegations’ and was co-operating with police inquiries. Now 51, the woman said she was a 20-year-old volunteer at the hospital when Savile lured her into his room and attacked her. She said: ‘I counted him as a friend as we had worked together at the hospital for a long time and I trusted him.

‘He was very strong and forceful when he realised I was resisting him. After it happened he told me not to tell anyone because he said no one would believe me.’

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2224573/Three-doctors-collaborated-abuse-Savile-helping-select-child-patients-rape.html