Archive for the ‘Filtering’ Category

Dutch whistleblower website Klokkenluideronline had previously been forced to move from a .nl domain to a .net domain and has now finally sought refuge in Iceland:

http://www.klokkenluideronline.is/

The website, operated by the Dutch version of Alex Jones, reporter Micha Kat, deals openly with highly controversial and sensitive issues such as dubious reporting by mainstream media, bank fraud, alleged child abuse by government officials, celebrities and royalty as well as serious and organized crime involving government representatives.

Multiple parties have been putting pressure on reporter Kat and his website recently, ranging from journalists to lawyers and public prosecutors…

He has also been incarcerated for a prolonged period of time (while awaiting his trial).

One of the most appalling events took place when a recent verdict against Micha Kat contained a phrase where it was argued that Kat’s attitude was criminogenic as his opinions differed from the the common norm in society, increasing the chances of him repeating what he had done

Ever since the introduction of the internet, freedom of speech is being threatened in each and every society (where people ‘higher up the food chain’ have something to hide), and certainly not only Russia or China.

His first website Klokkenluideronline.nl now redirects to the verdict in the court case initiated by Yehudi Moszkowicz and Marjolein Vissers, which forced him to remove various articles he had written from his blog as well as online search engines. Next to that he was no longer allowed to contact the lawyers by phone and he needed to refrain from visiting the law firm for a period of one year.

Previously:

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to visit The Netherlands for conference on Internet Freedom
http://vrritti.com/2011/11/26/secretary-of-state-hillary-clinton-to-visit-the-netherlands-for-conference-on-internet-freedom/

Freedom of information can be a real pain…

More:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57573151-93/european-parliament-blocks-citizen-e-mails-protesting-eu-porn-ban/

Movie fans in China Thursday welcomed a popular film website being unblocked by censors, but it was unclear whether the move suggested any wider relaxation in the country’s tightly-controlled media.

Chinese viewers discovered that restrictions on the IMDb (Internet Movie Database) website, which carries movie news and extensive production details on a huge number of films, had been unexpectedly lifted on Wednesday.

Both IMDb’s Chinese- and English-language versions were blocked in 2010, with many believing Beijing had acted after the site featured a movie on its homepage which focused on issues considered “sensitive” by the ruling Communist Party.

“This is really good news,” said one blogger on Sina Weibo, China’s version of Twitter, reacting on Thursday to the unblocking.

Print, film and broadcast media are tightly controlled in the country, while the Internet is subject to a range of restrictions known collectively as the Great Firewall of China.

More:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hZ6tBobzGqMwAORAzCUgnwwoRhYw

It just goes to show you can do anything you put your mind to, especially if you’re an authoritarian government hell-bent on the continued suppression of free speech.

More:
http://gizmodo.com/5989161/how-china-censors-its-twitter-at-light-speed

The controversial BitTorrent site is no longer listed among the top results when users search for “pirate bay,” independent of the user’s location. For other search terms The Pirate Bay is still listed on top. A Google spokesperson declined to comment on the record.

More:
http://torrentfreak.com/google-downranks-the-pirate-bay-in-uk-search-results-130306/

http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/03/how-verizon-found-a-child-pornographer-in-its-cloud/

Freedom of speech my ____

Freedom of speech and ‘the need for court orders’ is soooo 2012

http://gizmodo.com/5987746/apple-is-deleting-icloud-emails-that-have-the-phrase-barely-legal-teen-in-them

See also:

Great Algorithm of Facebook: Now blocking negative comments about Newtown massacre
http://vrritti.com/2013/02/27/great-algorithm-of-facebook-now-blocking-negative-comments-about-newtown-massacre/

Facebook MEGA FAIL: Social Media Giant Blocks Accounts Of Dutch National News Broadcaster And Its Employees (Without Court Order) Because The Word ‘Porn’ Had Been Posted
http://vrritti.com/2013/02/26/facebook-mega-fail-social-media-giant-blocks-accounts-of-dutch-national-news-broadcaster-and-its-employees-without-court-order-because-the-word-porn-had-been-posted/

And:
http://vrritti.com/?s=algorithm+stupid&submit=Search

 

After targeting Web sites for copyright infringement for years, Hollywood is now setting its sights on mobile apps, according to Reuters.

Time Warner, Walt Disney, Sony, Viacom, and Twentieth Century Fox have all recently sent app “take down” notices to Google. Citing copyright infringement, these studios are demanding that the Web giant remove apps that use the likeness of characters in their movies or TV shows.

One of the offending apps is “Hobbit 3D Wallpaper HD,” which has images from the popular movie, according to Reuters. Other apps are from movies like “Clash of the Titans,” “Spiderman,” and “Green Lantern.”

The app market is a lucrative one. According to Reuters, it’s worth $20 billion as of this year. Also, many of these apps get away without paying licensing fees.

“Smartphone apps that provide a direct link to infringing content have become a growing problem that needs to be addressed,” Motion Picture Association of America’s senior vice president for Internet content protection Marc Miller told Reuters. “Not only do these apps offer access to creative content that has been illegally copied, but they also pose risks to consumers from malware and often fail to provide viewers with the quality product they could often get through a growing number of legitimate sources.”

According to Reuters, Google is complying with the studios’ requests and is removing many of these apps from its Google Play app store. An Apple spokesperson wouldn’t comment on take down notices for Reuters but did say that it reviews all apps before offering them in its App Store.

More:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57571976-93/movie-studios-target-mobile-apps-for-copyright-infringement/

Market research firm NPD Group has reported in its Annual Music Study 2012 that the number of broadband ISP internet users using peer-to-peer (P2P) based file sharing services to “illegally” download music declined by 17% in 2012 to 21 million people (down from a peak of 33m in 2005).

According to the NPD’s latest data, the volume of “illegally downloaded music files” from P2P services also declined by 26% in 2012 and the volume of music downloads from digital lockers (e.g. “cyber locker” online file storage and sharing websites like Rapidshare etc.) decreased by 28%.

Similarly some 40% of consumers who claimed to have illegally downloaded music via P2P in 2011 reported that they’d now stopped or were downloading less music. Apparently the “primary reason” for this reduced activity was an increased use of free and legal music streaming services like Spotify. But shutting down sites like Limewire and The Pirate Bay has also had an impact.

More:
http://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.php/2013/02/npd-group-report-17-percent-fall-in-p2p-internet-music-piracy-for-2012.html

The website blocking phenomenon has continued today in the UK, with the High Court adding three major torrent sites to the country’s unofficial ban list. Following complaints from the music industry led by the BPI, the Court ordered the UK’s leading Internet service providers to begin censoring subscriber access to Kickass Torrents, H33T and Fenopy.

More:
http://torrentfreak.com/high-court-orders-uk-isps-to-block-kickass-torrents-h33t-and-fenopy-130228/

http://www.infowars.com/facebook-to-block-negative-comments-about-newtown-massacre/

Who needs China or Russia when you have Facebook?

None of the employees of the Dutch National News Broadcaster NOS will have access to the company’s Facebook account for the next 24 hours NOR THE PRIVATE PAGES OF THE EMPLOYEES AT THE NOS only because the broadcaster posted a news article which had the word ‘porn’ in its headline.

The news article made mention of a Belgian teacher who had been watching porn videos in an auditorium of the University of Wageningen in The Netherlands. That article was forwarded automatically to the broadcaster’s Facebook page and the latter was not amused and put the sanction in place. (Trial By Algorithm).

The NOS will contact Facebook to discuss the matter.

Dutch language news article (not available on Facebook):
http://www.nu.nl/media/3350747/facebook-straft-nos-pornobericht.html

http://torrentfreak.com/the-pirate-bay-departs-sweden-and-sets-sail-for-norway-and-spain-130225/

In a letter to the U.S. Trade Representative Nintendo urges the Government to put pressure on foreign countries to do a better job at tackling online piracy. The game company says it’s suffering “huge losses” due to the unauthorized distribution of their games. Among other things, Nintendo calls for blocking of file-sharing websites and criminal prosecution against those who pirate games or facilitate copyright infringement

More:
http://torrentfreak.com/nintendo-wants-to-hunt-down-game-pirates-and-block-websites-130225/

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/02/if-google-is-demoting-pirate-sites-why-is-mp3skull-still-a-top-result/

http://torrentfreak.com/google-refuses-to-index-huge-streaming-movie-portal-homepage-130220/

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/02/20/google_adblock_plus/

“These sites consistently appear at the top of Google’s search results for popular songs or artists.”

Additional excerpts:

• Over the six-month period, Google received notices for tens of millions of copyright removal requests concerning various sites, including multiple repeat notices of infringement of the same content on the same site;
• The sites we analyzed, all of which were serial infringers per Google’s Copyright Transparency Report, were not demoted in any significant way in the search results and still managed to appear on page 1 of the search results over 98% of the time in the searches conducted;
• In fact, these sites consistently showed up in 3 to 5 of the top 10 search results

Check out the report’s executive summary [here] and entire report for additional details.

“We recognize and appreciate that Google has undertaken some positive steps to address links to illegal music on its network,” said Steven M. Marks, EVP & General Counsel, RIAA. “Unfortunately, our initial analysis concludes that so far Google’s pledge six months ago to demote pirate sites remains unfulfilled. Searches for popular music continue to yield results that emphasize illegal sites at the expense of legitimate services, which are often relegated to later pages. And Google’s auto-complete function continues to lead users to many of those same illicit sites.

More:
http://www.riaa.com/blog.php?content_selector=riaa-news-blog&content_selector=riaa-news-blog&blog_selector=Googles-Move-&news_month_filter=2&news_year_filter=2013

German rights group wants $0.005 per stream and Google says nein

More:
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/02/germans-cant-see-meteorite-youtube-videos-due-to-copyright-dispute/

F-Secure Antibot automates the remediation process by remotely disinfecting the devices which are infected on a network by guiding the user through a simple self-cleaning process, cutting out the need to call the operator helpdesk saving millions of dollars for an average sized Operator. Literally in a matter of minutes, Antibot will clean up the infected machine making it ready for use without the frustratingly slow performance that was experienced before. Convert that customer experience into a positive one. Satisfied customers are less likely to churn while increasing your reputation as a secure Operator. Antibot is fully customizable with your brand.

More:
http://www.f-secure.com/en/web/operators_global/network-security

Playing nice with content owners – Check
Killing the ‘competition’ while targeting pirates and piracy – Check
Making more money with quality content on YouTube – …

Google executives are in talks with Visa, Paypal and Mastercard to block illegal websites from receiving funding, the Telegraph has reported.

It might mean Google could avoid making more alterations to its search results to disadvantage illegal sites, the report said.

Google has in the past urged authorities to “follow the money” when it comes to stamping out piracy sites.

Similar blocking measures were put in place against the Wikileaks website.

The site, which published large amounts of classified documents, had its funding sources strangled by firms who were reportedly pressured by US authorities into taking action.

The move was controversial, with many calling for boycotts of the companies involved.

More:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-21505060

Dutch anti-piracy organization BREIN is removing 10,000 search results (pointing to pirated content) per day. That’s the maximum amount of requests – from one single source – Google is able to process on a daily basis. BREIN does expect that it will be able to make use of upcoming changes implemented by Google which will allow them to submit 40,000 requests for removal per day.

Google’s spokesperson Mark Jansen indicates that the limitation can be lifted quite easily and that the limitation has been implemented to prevent data traffic peaks which may cause technical problems. Google is already de-indexing pirate websites. The search engine is currently removing 2.5 million search results per week, which should provide Google with some interesting business intelligence. The 2.5 million search results which are being removed make up less than 1% of the number of pages that are being indexed.

Dutch language news article:
http://www.nu.nl/internet/3204249/brein-wil-meer-zoekresultaten-google-verwijderen.html

http://torrentfreak.com/pirate-bay-blockades-upheld-by-court-of-appeal-120212/

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/02/11/mens_rights_site_blacklist/

The removal notice for the popular clip, which was posted by a Texas group known as Defense Distributed, said the video was removed “as a violation of YouTube’s policy against spam, scams, and commercially deceptive content.”

http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57568487-93/youtube-yanks-video-of-3d-printed-rifle-magazine/

http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/02/google-chrome-is-blocking-a-bunch-of-major-sites-for-malware-even-youtube/

How much money does Google make from (advertising next to) links to pirated content that are available between post and takedown? Or (advertising next to) those links to pirated content that are not being removed at all?

http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-set-for-historic-10000000th-google-url-takedown-130204/

Google Chrome users, among others, couldn’t access some of the most popular Web sites Monday after an advertising network’s corporate Web site was injected with malware. But, according to the ad company’s chief executive, those sites were safe.

Those who called up sites such as The Huffington Post, New York Times, Los Angeles Times, Washington Post and many other media sites, among others, were greeted with a warning that the sites contained malware. An example of a warning: “Content from cm.netseer.com, a known malware distributor, has been inserted into this web page. Visiting this page now is very likely to infect your computer with malware.” Another warned that the virus peddler was images.buddytv.com.

In both cases, the culprit turned out to be the Santa Clara, Calif. startup Netseer, an advertising provider with a considerable global digital footprint.

“Early this morning we received alerts that our 3rd party hosted corporate website (netseer.com) was hacked and infected with malware. Consequently, Google added our domain to the list of malware affected websites and Chrome and some other browsers started blocking any sites that had ‘netseer.com’ code,” according to a letter from the CEO on the company’s homepage.

“Our ad serving infrastructure is completely different from the corporate website but shares the same domain (netseer.com). So although the malware never impacted the ad serving all our ad serving partners saw Chrome and other browsers flagging malware warnings to users. To reiterate, the malware was never served into ad serving stream and the browser behavior was completely due to ad serving and the corporate website sharing the same domain name.”

The company said Google had removed the site from its malware impacted site list by 9:30 a.m. Pacific time, but users continued to report blocked sites hours throughtout the day.

According to various news reports, Internet Explorer users had no trouble accessing the impacted sites with that browser.

http://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/google-blocks-high-profile-sites-after-advertising-provider-netseer-hacked-020413

While Spotify isn’t a peer-to-peer program along the lines of Napster, its inner workings appear subject to the longstanding ban on so-called P2P technology — a blockade lawmakers erected to thwart illegal file-sharing and prevent downloads from infecting computers with malware.

“To help protect House data, our IT policy generally prohibits the use of peer-to-peer (P2P) technologies while operating within the secure network,” a spokesman for the Office of the Chief Administrative Officer told POLITICO this week. “While Spotify is currently not authorized, the CAO has and will continue to work with outside vendors to enable the popular services that improve member communication capabilities.”

For its part, Spotify isn’t pleased. “It is a sad day when a few bureaucrats can block our nation’s leadership from enjoying free, secure access to over 20 million songs,” a spokesman told POLITICO. “Music is a common language that all political parties speak and should be used to bring the legislators of this great country together so they can solve the serious issues facing our nation.”

More:
http://www.politico.com/story/2013/01/house-blocks-spotify-not-singing-along-87008.html

http://torrentfreak.com/hbo-wants-google-to-censor-hbo-com-130203/

Yandex, Russia’s reigning internet powerhouse, has found its latest endeavor thwarted by Facebook after Facebook revoked access to its social graph.

Yandex’s new mobile social “assistant” Wonder was supposed to coalesce a user’s data from Facebook, Twitter, Foursquare, and Instagram and use the data to help answer questions asked verbally, sort of like the Siri feature on Apple’s iPhone. Instead, Yandex is now in a dispute with Facebook, TechCrunch reports, with the two sides at odds over whether Wonder is properly defined as a search engine and thus in violation of rules governing the use of data provided by Facebook through its software interfaces, or APIs. In the meantime, Facebook has cut off Yandex’s API access, rendering Wonder significantly less viable. (Facebook could not be reached for comment.)

The Facebook’s Yandex blockade is the latest in a series of information embargoes between competing internet giants. Facebook’s Instagram recently blocked users from showing their pictures on the microblogging network Twitter. Twitter, in turn, has been steadily tightening the restrictions on apps that use its own APIs. And Google recently allowed its own photo app Snapseed to publish into its social network Google+ while rivals like Instagram remain entirely locked out.

Previously:

Money And Ecosystems Will Decide On Freedom Of Information & Innovation, Not Governments
http://vrritti.com/2013/01/27/money-and-ecosystems-will-decide-on-freedom-of-information-innovation-not-governments/

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/01/six-year-old-dancing-baby-lawsuit-set-for-jury-trial/

http://torrentfreak.com/mega-launch-video-removed-from-youtube-by-music-rights-outfit-130124/

No court order needed

http://gizmodo.com/5978202/apple-removed-a-photo-app-from-the-app-store-because-artistic-nudity-is-the-devil-or-something

These tricks are getting old…

A European Union report has urged tight press regulation and demanded that Brussels officials are given control of national media supervisors with new powers to enforce fines or the sacking of journalists.

The “high level” recommendations that will be used to draft future EU legislation also attack David Cameron for failing to automatically implement proposals by the Lord Justice Leveson inquiry for a state regulation of British press.

A “high level” EU panel, that includes Latvia’s former president and a former German justice minister, was ordered by Neelie Kroes, European Commission vice-president, last year to report on “media freedom and pluralism“. It has concluded that it is time to introduce new rules to rein in the press.

“All EU countries should have independent media councils,” the report concluded.

Media councils should have real enforcement powers, such as the imposition of fines, orders for printed or broadcast apologies, or removal of journalistic status.”

As well as setting up state regulators with draconian powers, the panel also recommended that the European Commission be placed in overall control in order to ensure that the new watchdogs do not breach EU laws.

The national media councils should follow a set of European-wide standards and be monitored by the Commission to ensure that they comply with European values,” the report said.

The EU report praises Lord Justice Leveson’s controversial proposals and attacks politicians, including the Prime Minister, that have questioned state regulation of newspapers.

“The gross abuses revealed in the Leveson enquiry have led its author to propose much more stringent institutional supervision, where the media would be much more closely monitored,” the report said.

“That judge Leveson’s recommendations should have been rejected out of hand by some politicians in high office, is not very reassuring.”

Mrs Kroes last night hailed the report’s “concrete ideas for action” as providing “exactly what I was looking for”.

Ensuring the independence of regulators across the member states and their cooperation will be high on my agenda,” she said.

“The recommendations in this report are an important basis for the tough and principled discussion we urgently need in the EU.”

The report’s recommendations have sparked anger in Britain, a country that is often criticised by European officials for its media coverage of EU issues

A spokesman for the Department for Culture, Media and Sport said: “We have no intention of allowing Europe to regulate the British press. We have been clear that, as set out in the Leveson report, we expect the British press industry to implement tough, independent, self-regulation.”

Douglas Carswell, the Conservative MP for Clacton, attacked the report for making an “extraordinary, and deeply disturbing proposal”.

“Having EU officials overseeing our free press – and monitoring newspapers to ensure they comply with “European values” – would be quite simply intolerable,” he said.

This is the sort of mind-set that I would expect to find in Iran, not the West. This kooky idea tells us little about the future of press regulation. It does suggest that the European project is ultimately incompatible with the notion of a free society.”

Nigel Farage, the leader of Ukip, compared the proposals to “Orwell’s 1984”. “This is a flagrant attack on press freedom. To hear that unelected bureaucrats in Brussels want the power to fine and suspend journalists is just outrageous,” he said.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/leveson-inquiry/9817625/Leveson-EU-wants-power-to-sack-journalists.html